Deuteronomy 21:15
ContextNET © | Suppose a man has two wives, one whom he loves more than the other, 1 and they both 2 bear him sons, with the firstborn being the child of the less loved wife. |
NIV © | If a man has two wives, and he loves one but not the other, and both bear him sons but the firstborn is the son of the wife he does not love, |
NASB © | "If a man has two wives, the one loved and the other unloved, and both the loved and the unloved have borne him sons, if the firstborn son belongs to the unloved, |
NLT © | "Suppose a man has two wives, but he loves one and not the other, and both have given him sons. And suppose the firstborn son is the son of the wife he does not love. |
MSG © | When a man has two wives, one loved and the other hated, and they both give him sons, but the firstborn is from the hated wife, |
BBE © | If a man has two wives, one greatly loved and the other hated, and the two of them have had children by him; and if the first son is the child of the hated wife: |
NRSV © | If a man has two wives, one of them loved and the other disliked, and if both the loved and the disliked have borne him sons, the firstborn being the son of the one who is disliked, |
NKJV © | "If a man has two wives, one loved and the other unloved, and they have borne him children, both the loved and the unloved, and if the firstborn son is of her who is unloved, |
KJV | |
NASB © | |
HEBREW | |
LXXM | |
NET © [draft] ITL | |
NET © | Suppose a man has two wives, one whom he loves more than the other, 1 and they both 2 bear him sons, with the firstborn being the child of the less loved wife. |
NET © Notes |
1 tn Heb “one whom he loves and one whom he hates.” For the idea of שָׂנֵא (sane’, “hate”) meaning to be rejected or loved less (cf. NRSV “disliked”), see Gen 29:31, 33; Mal 1:2-3. Cf. A. Konkel, NIDOTTE 3:1256-60. 2 tn Heb “both the one whom he loves and the one whom he hates.” On the meaning of the phrase “one whom he loves and one whom he hates” see the note on the word “other” earlier in this verse. The translation has been simplified for stylistic reasons, to avoid redundancy. |