Proverbs 28:21

To show partiality ¹  is terrible, ²  for a person will transgress over the smallest piece of bread. ³ 

To show partiality is not good—yet a man will do wrong for a piece of bread.

To show partiality is not good, Because for a piece of bread a man will transgress.

Showing partiality is never good, yet some will do wrong for something as small as a piece of bread.

Playing favorites is always a bad thing; you can do great harm in seemingly harmless ways.

It is not good to have respect for a man’s position: for a man will do wrong for a bit of bread.

To show partiality is not good—yet for a piece of bread a person may do wrong.

To show partiality is not good, Because for a piece of bread a man will transgress.

To show partiality ¹  is terrible, ²  for a person will transgress over the smallest piece of bread. ³ 

¹ tn The construction uses the Hiphil infinitive הַכֵּר (hakken) as the subject of the sentence: “to have respect for [or, recognize] persons is not good” (e.g., 24:23; 18:5; Deut 1:17; Lev 19:15). Such favoritism is “not good”; instead, it is a miscarriage of justice and is to be avoided.

² tn Heb “not good.” This is a figure of speech known as tapeinosis – a deliberate understatement to emphasize a worst-case scenario: “it is terrible!”

³ tn The meaning and connection of the line is not readily clear. It could be taken in one of two ways: (1) a person can steal even a small piece of bread if hungry, and so the court should show some compassion, or it should show no partiality even in such a pathetic case; (2) a person could be bribed for a very small price (a small piece of bread being the figure representing this). This second view harmonizes best with the law.