Jude 1:11
ContextNET © | Woe to them! For they have traveled down Cain’s path, 1 and because of greed 2 have abandoned themselves 3 to 4 Balaam’s error; hence, 5 they will certainly perish 6 in Korah’s rebellion. |
NIV © | Woe to them! They have taken the way of Cain; they have rushed for profit into Balaam’s error; they have been destroyed in Korah’s rebellion. |
NASB © | Woe to them! For they have gone the way of Cain, and for pay they have rushed headlong into the error of Balaam, and perished in the rebellion of Korah. |
NLT © | How terrible it will be for them! For they follow the evil example of Cain, who killed his brother. Like Balaam, they will do anything for money. And like Korah, they will perish because of their rebellion. |
MSG © | I'm fed up with them! They've gone down Cain's road; they've been sucked into Balaam's error by greed; they're canceled out in Korah's rebellion. |
BBE © | A curse on them! They have gone in the way of Cain, running uncontrolled into the error of Balaam for reward, and have come to destruction by saying evil against the Lord, like Korah. |
NRSV © | Woe to them! For they go the way of Cain, and abandon themselves to Balaam’s error for the sake of gain, and perish in Korah’s rebellion. |
NKJV © | Woe to them! For they have gone in the way of Cain, have run greedily in the error of Balaam for profit, and perished in the rebellion of Korah. |
KJV | |
NASB © | |
GREEK | |
NET © [draft] ITL | |
NET © | Woe to them! For they have traveled down Cain’s path, 1 and because of greed 2 have abandoned themselves 3 to 4 Balaam’s error; hence, 5 they will certainly perish 6 in Korah’s rebellion. |
NET © Notes |
1 tn Or “they have gone the way of Cain.” 2 tn Grk “for wages.” 3 tn The verb ἐκχέω (ekcew) normally means “pour out.” Here, in the passive, it occasionally has a reflexive idea, as BDAG 312 s.v. 3. suggests (with extra-biblical examples). 4 tn Or “in.” 5 tn Grk “and.” See note on “perish” later in this verse. 6 tn The three verbs in this verse are all aorist indicative (“have gone down,” “have abandoned,” “have perished”). Although the first and second could be considered constative or ingressive, the last is almost surely proleptic (referring to the certainty of their future judgment). Although it may seem odd that a proleptic aorist is so casually connected to other aorists with a different syntactical force, it is not unparalleled (cf. Rom 8:30). |