Discovery BoxExodus 2:13 
Context2:13 When he went out 1 the next day, 2 there were 3 two Hebrew men fighting. So he said to the one who was in the wrong, 4 “Why are you attacking 5 your fellow Hebrew?” 6
Exodus 25:35
Context25:35 with a bud under the first 7 two branches from it, and a bud under the next 8 two branches from it, and a bud under the third 9 two branches from it, according to the six branches that extend from the lampstand.
Exodus 26:19
Context26:19 and you are to make forty silver bases to go under the twenty frames – two bases under the first frame for its two projections, and likewise 10 two bases under the next frame for its two projections;
Exodus 32:6
Context32:6 So they got up early on the next day and offered up burnt offerings and brought peace offerings, and the people sat down to eat and drink, 11 and they rose up to play. 12
Exodus 32:30
Context32:30 The next day Moses said to the people, 13 “You have committed a very serious sin, 14 but now I will go up to the Lord – perhaps I can make atonement 15 on behalf of your sin.”
Exodus 36:24
Context36:24 He made forty silver bases under the twenty frames – two bases under the first frame for its two projections, and likewise 16 two bases under the next frame for its two projections,
Exodus 37:21
Context37:21 with a bud under the first two branches from it, and a bud under the next two branches from it, and a bud under the third two branches from it; according to the six branches that extended from it. 17
1 tn The preterite with the vav consecutive is subordinated to the main idea of the verse.
2 tn Heb “the second day” (so KJV, ASV).
3 tn The deictic particle is used here to predicate existence, as in “here were” or “there were.” But this use of הִנֵּה (hinneh) indicates also that what he encountered was surprising or sudden – as in “Oh, look!”
4 tn The word רָשָׁע (rasha’) is a legal term, meaning the guilty. This guilty man rejects Moses’ intervention for much the same reason Pharaoh will later (5:2) – he does not recognize his authority. Later Pharaoh will use this term to declare himself as in the wrong (9:27) and God in the right.
5 tn This is the third use of the verb נָכָה (nakha) in the passage; here it is the Hiphil imperfect. It may be given a progressive imperfect nuance – the attack was going on when Moses tried to intervene.
6 sn Heb “your neighbor.” The word רֵעֶךָ (re’ekha) appears again in 33:11 to describe the ease with which God and Moses conversed. The Law will have much to say about how the Israelites were to treat their “neighbors, fellow citizens” (Exod 20:16-17; 21:14, 18, 35; 22:7-11, 14, 26; cf. Luke 10:25-37).
7 tn For clarity the phrase “the first” has been supplied.
8 tn For clarity the phrase “the next” has been supplied.
9 tn For clarity the phrase “the third” has been supplied.
10 tn The clause is repeated to show the distributive sense; it literally says, “and two bases under the one frame for its two projections.”
11 tn The second infinitive is an infinitive absolute. The first is an infinitive construct with a lamed (ל) preposition, expressing the purpose of their sitting down. The infinitive absolute that follows cannot take the preposition, but with the conjunction follows the force of the form before it (see GKC 340 §113.e).
12 tn The form is לְצַחֵק (lÿtsakheq), a Piel infinitive construct, giving the purpose of their rising up after the festal meal. On the surface it would seem that with the festival there would be singing and dancing, so that the people were celebrating even though they did not know the reason. W. C. Kaiser says the word means “drunken immoral orgies and sexual play” (“Exodus,” EBC 2:478). That is quite an assumption for this word, but is reflected in some recent English versions (e.g., NCV “got up and sinned sexually”; TEV “an orgy of drinking and sex”). The word means “to play, trifle.” It can have other meanings, depending on its contexts. It is used of Lot when he warned his sons-in-law and appeared as one who “mocked” them; it is also used of Ishmael “playing” with Isaac, which Paul interprets as mocking; it is used of Isaac “playing” with his wife in a manner that revealed to Abimelech that they were not brother and sister, and it is used by Potiphar’s wife to say that her husband brought this slave Joseph in to “mock” them. The most that can be gathered from these is that it is playful teasing, serious mocking, or playful caresses. It might fit with wild orgies, but there is no indication of that in this passage, and the word does not mean it. The fact that they were festive and playing before an idol was sufficient.
13 tn Heb “and it was on the morrow and Moses said to the people.”
14 tn The text uses a cognate accusative: “you have sinned a great sin.”
15 tn The form אֲכַפְּרָה (’akhappÿrah) is a Piel cohortative/imperfect. Here with only a possibility of being successful, a potential imperfect nuance works best.
16 tn The clause is repeated to show the distributive sense; it literally says, “and two bases under the one frame for its two projections.”
17 tn As in Exod 26:35, the translation of “first” and “next” and “third” is interpretive, because the text simply says “under two branches” in each of three places.
