Internet Verse Search Commentaries Word Analysis ITL - draft

Luke 3:31

NET ©	the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan,¹ the son of David,²
NIV ©	the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David,
NASB ©	the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David,
NLT ©	Eliakim was the son of Melea. Melea was the son of Menna. Menna was the son of Mattatha. Mattatha was the son of Nathan. Nathan was the son of David.
MSG ©	son of Melea, son of Menna, son of Mattatha, son of Nathan, son of David,
BBE ©	The son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David,
NRSV ©	son of Melea, son of Menna, son of Mattatha, son of Nathan, son of David,
NKJV ©	the son of Melea, the son of Menan, the son of Mattathah, the son of Nathan, the son of David,

KJV	Which was [the son] of Melea <3190>_, which was [the son] of Menan <3104>_, which was [the son] of Mattatha <3160>_, which was [the son] of Nathan <3481>_, which was [the son] of David <1138>_,
NASB ©	the son of Melea <3190> , the son of Menna <3303> , the son of Mattatha <3160> , the son of Nathan <3481> , the son of David <1160> ,
GREEK	tou <3588> T-GSM melea <3190> N-PRI tou <3588> T-GSM menna <3104> N-PRI tou <3588> T-GSM mattaya <3160> N-PRI tou <3588> T-GSM nayam <3481> N-PRI tou <3588> T-GSM dauid <1138> N-PRI
NET © [draft] ITL	the son of Melea <3190> , the son of Menna <3104> , the son of Mattatha <3160> , the son of Nathan <3481> , the son of David <1138> ,
NET ©	the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan,¹ the son of David,²
NET © Notes	¹sn The use of Nathan here as the son of David is different than Matthew, where Solomon is named. Nathan was David’s third son. It is not entirely clear what causes the difference. Some argue Nathan stresses a prophetic connection, but it is not clear how (through confusion with the prophet Nathan?). Others note the absence of a reference to Jeconiah later, so that here there is a difference to show the canceling out of this line. The differences appear to mean that Matthew’s line is a “royal and physical” line, while Luke has a “royal and legal” line. ²sn The mention of David begins a series of agreements with Matthew’s line. The OT background is 1 Chr 2:1-15 and Ruth 4:18-22.

Search Type	Description	Example
all	search for verses that contains all of the search words.	"fish bread" will search for verses that contains fish AND bread in minimum 1 bible version
phrase	search for verses that contains all of the search phrase.	"fish bread" will search for verses that contains "fish bread" in minimum 1 bible version
at least one	search for verses that contains any of the search words.	"fish bread" will search for verses that contains fish OR bread in minumum 1 bible version
without	search for verses not contained of the search words. Without can not be used by it self, meaning that it has to be minimum one more condition included (all/at least one,etc)	all: "fish", without: "bread", will search for verses that contains "fish" but NOT "bread"
start	search for verses that contains words that start with the search words	"fis" will search for verses that contains words start with "fis", the result will be "fish", "fishing", "fisherman", etc
similar	search for verses that contains words that similar in spelling to the search words.	"fish" will search verses that contain words which has similar spelling with fish. The result: "dish",etc
displaying	set the max displaying in one page.	"20" will set displaying max to 20 per page
range	set searching range	"All Bible", "Old Testament", "New Testament"

Display Bible

Universal Search :

TIP #26: To open links on Discovery Box in a new window, use the right click. [ALL]

created in 0.03 seconds
powered by bible.org