Texts Notes Verse List Exact Search
Results 121 - 140 of 295 for eating (0.000 seconds)
Jump to page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
  Discovery Box
(0.30) (Lev 22:16)

sn That is, when the lay people eat portions of offerings that should have been eaten only by priests and those who belonged to priestly households.

(0.30) (Lev 7:26)

tn Heb “and any blood you must not eat in any of your dwelling places, to the bird and to the animal.”

(0.30) (Exo 16:12)

tn The verb means “to be sated, satisfied”; in this context it indicates that they would have sufficient bread to eat—they would be full.

(0.30) (Exo 12:9)

sn This ruling was to prevent their eating it just softened by the fire or partially roasted as differing customs might prescribe or allow.

(0.30) (Gen 43:32)

sn That the Egyptians found eating with foreigners disgusting is well-attested in extra-biblical literature by writers like Herodotus, Diodorus, and Strabo.

(0.30) (Gen 43:25)

tn Heb “eat bread.” The imperfect verbal form is used here as a historic future (future from the perspective of the past).

(0.30) (Gen 27:25)

tn Heb “Bring near to me and I will eat of the wild game, my son.” Following the imperative, the cohortative with the prefixed conjunction indicates purpose or result.

(0.28) (Act 21:25)

sn What has been strangled. That is, to refrain from eating animals that had been killed without having the blood drained from them. According to the Mosaic law (Lev 17:13-14) Jews were forbidden to eat flesh with the blood still in it (note the preceding provision in this verse, and blood).

(0.28) (Act 15:29)

sn What has been strangled. That is, to refrain from eating animals that had been killed without having the blood drained from them. According to the Mosaic law (Lev 17:13-14), Jews were forbidden to eat flesh with the blood still in it (note the preceding provision in this verse, and from blood).

(0.28) (Act 15:20)

sn What has been strangled. That is, to refrain from eating animals that had been killed without having the blood drained from them. According to the Mosaic law (Lev 17:13-14), Jews were forbidden to eat flesh with the blood still in it (note the following provision in Acts 15:20, and from blood).

(0.28) (Luk 24:41)

sn Do you have anything here to eat? Eating would remove the idea that a phantom was present. Angelic spirits refused a meal in Judg 13:16 and Tob 12:19, but accepted it in Gen 18:8; 19:3 and Tob 6:6. (Tobit, a book of the OT Apocrypha, reflects views during the intertestamental period.)

(0.28) (Luk 5:33)

tn Grk “but yours are eating and drinking.” The translation “continue to eat and drink” attempts to reflect the progressive or durative nature of the action described, which in context is a practice not limited to the specific occasion at hand (the banquet).

(0.28) (Luk 4:2)

sn The reference to Jesus eating nothing could well be an idiom meaning that he ate only what the desert provided; see Exod 34:28. A desert fast simply meant eating only what one could obtain in the desert. The parallel in Matt 4:2 speaks only of Jesus fasting.

(0.28) (Zec 9:7)

tn Heb “and I will take away their blood from their mouth and their abominations from between their teeth.” These expressions refer to some type of abominable religious practices, perhaps eating meat with the blood still in it (less likely NCV “drinking blood”) or eating unclean or forbidden foods.

(0.28) (Lam 4:10)

tn Heb “eating.” The infinitive construct (from I בָּרָה, barah) is translated as a noun. Three passages employ the verb (2 Sam 3:35; 12:17; 13:5, 6, 10) for eating when one is ill or in mourning.

(0.28) (Isa 5:17)

sn The image completes the picture begun in v. 14 and adds to the irony. When judgment comes, Sheol will eat up the sinners who frequent the feasts; then the banqueting halls will lie in ruins and only sheep will eat there.

(0.28) (Ecc 4:5)

tn Heb “and eats his own flesh.” Most English versions render the idiom literally: “and eats/consumes his flesh” (KJV, AS, NASB, NAB, RSV, NRSV, NJPS). However, a few versions attempt to explain the idiom: “and lets life go to ruin” (Moffatt), “and wastes away” (NEB), “and ruins himself” (NIV).

(0.28) (Pro 18:21)

tn The referent of “it” must be the tongue, i.e., what the tongue says (= “its use”). So those who enjoy talking, indulging in it, must “eat” its fruit, whether good or bad. The expression “eating the fruit” is an implied comparison; it means accept the consequences of loving to talk (cf. TEV).

(0.28) (1Sa 1:9)

tn Heb “after eating in Shiloh, and after drinking.” Since Hannah had refused to eat, it must refer to the others. The Hebrew also sets off the phrase “and after drinking” probably to prepare the reader for Eli’s mistaken assumption that Hannah had had too much too drink.

(0.28) (Num 15:19)

tn The verse has a temporal clause that actually continues or supplements the temporal clause of the preceding verse. It is made up of the temporal indicator, the infinitive construct with the preposition, and the suffixed subjective genitive: “and it shall be when you eat.” Here it is translated simply “and eat” since the temporal element was introduced in the last verse.



TIP #01: Welcome to the NEXT Bible Web Interface and Study System!! [ALL]
created in 0.05 seconds
powered by bible.org