Your search for "To" did not find any bible verses that matched.
Discovery Box| (0.27) | (Num 10:9) | 1 tn Both the “adversary” and “opposes” come from the same root: צָרַר (tsarar), “to hem in, oppress, harass,” or basically, “be an adversary.” |
| (0.27) | (Num 9:21) | 3 tn The construction in this half of the verse uses two vav (ו) consecutive clauses. The first is subordinated to the second as a temporal clause: “when…then….” |
| (0.27) | (Num 8:24) | 1 tn Heb “this which to the Levites.” The meaning is “This is what concerns the Levites,” that is, the following rulings are for them. |
| (0.27) | (Num 8:17) | 1 tn The idiomatic “on the day of” precedes the infinitive construct of נָכָה (nakhah) to form the temporal clause: “in the day of my striking…” becomes “when I struck.” |
| (0.27) | (Num 8:11) | 1 tn The Hebrew text actually has “wave the Levites as a wave offering.” The wave offering was part of the ritual of the peace offering and indicated the priest’s portion being presented to God in a lifted, waving motion for all to see. The Levites were going to be in the sanctuary to serve the Lord and assist the priests. It is unclear how Moses would have presented them as wave offerings, but the intent is that they would be living sacrifices, as Paul would later say in Rom 12:1 for all Christians. |
| (0.27) | (Num 8:7) | 1 tn Or, more literally, “and thus you shall do.” The verb is the imperfect tense of instruction or legislation. Here it introduces the procedures to be followed. |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:23) | 2 tn The Piel imperfect has the nuance of instruction. The particle “thus” explains that the following oracle is the form to use. |
| (0.27) | (Num 7:10) | 5 tn The adverbial clause uses the Niphal infinitive construct as the main verb. The word is the well-known מָשַׁח (mashakh, “to anoint, smear”). |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:21) | 2 tn Heb “whatever else his hand is able to provide.” The imperfect tense has the nuance of potential imperfect—“whatever he can provide.” |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:18) | 3 tn Heb “which is under the peace offering.” The verse does not mean that the hair had to be put under that sacrifice and directly on the fire. |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:11) | 3 tn The burnt offering (Lev 1) reflects the essence of atonement: By this sacrifice the worshiper was completely surrendering to God, and God was completely accepting the worshiper. |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:7) | 2 tn The construction uses the infinitive construct with the preposition and the suffixed subjective genitive—“in the dying of them”—to form the adverbial clause of time. |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:7) | 1 tn The vav (ו) conjunction at the beginning of the clause specifies the cases of corpses that are to be avoided, no matter how painful it might be. |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:2) | 3 tn The construction uses the infinitive construct followed by the cognate accusative: “to vow a vow.” This intensifies the idea that the vow is being taken carefully. |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:4) | 2 sn Here is another hapax legomenon, a word only found here. The word seems linked to the verb “to be clear,” and so may mean the thin skin of the grape. The reason for the strictness with these two words in this verse is uncertain. We know the actual meanings of the words, and the combination must form a merism here, meaning no part of the grape could be eaten. Abstaining from these common elements of food was to be a mark of commitment to the Lord. Hos 3:1 even denounces the raisin cakes as part of a pagan world, and eating them would be a violation of the oath. |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:2) | 2 tn The vow is considered special in view of the use of the verb יַפְלִא (yafliʾ), the Hiphil imperfect of the verb “to be wonderful, extraordinary.” |
| (0.27) | (Num 6:2) | 1 tn The formula is used here again: “a man or a woman—when he takes.” The vow is open to both men and women. |
| (0.27) | (Num 5:15) | 4 tn The final verbal form, מַזְכֶּרֶת (mazkeret), explains what the memorial was all about—it was causing iniquity to be remembered. |
| (0.27) | (Num 5:13) | 3 tn The noun clause beginning with the simple conjunction is here a circumstantial clause, explaining that there was no witness to the sin. |
| (0.27) | (Num 5:4) | 1 tn The perfect tense is here given a past perfect nuance to stress that the word of the Lord preceded the obedience. |
