Texts Notes Verse List Exact Search
Results 21 - 40 of 157 for Aaron's (0.001 seconds)
Jump to page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
  Discovery Box
(0.50) (Exo 29:5)

tn The Hiphil of לָבַשׁ (lavash, “to clothe”) will take double accusatives; so the sign of the accusative is with Aaron, and then with the articles of clothing. The translation will have to treat Aaron as the direct object and the articles as indirect objects because Aaron receives the prominence in the verse—you will clothe Aaron.

(0.50) (Exo 29:10)

tn The verb is singular, agreeing with the first of the compound subject—Aaron.

(0.50) (Exo 10:11)

tn Heb “they”; the referent (Moses and Aaron) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

(0.50) (Exo 7:22)

tn Heb “to them”; the referents (Moses and Aaron) have been specified in the translation for clarity.

(0.46) (Lev 8:27)

tn Heb “and he waved.” The subject of the verb “he waved” is Aaron, but Aaron’s sons also performed the action (see “Aaron and his sons” just previously). See the similar shifts from Moses to Aaron as the subject of the action above (vv. 15, 16, 19, 20, 23), and esp. the note on Lev 8:15. In the present translation this is rendered as an adjectival clause (“who waved”) to indicate that the referent is not Moses but Aaron and his sons. Cf. CEV “who lifted it up”; NAB “whom he had wave” (with “he” referring to Moses here).

(0.44) (Num 20:24)

tn The verb is in the second person plural form, and so it is Moses and Aaron who rebelled, and so now because of that Aaron first and then Moses would die without going into the land.

(0.44) (Num 16:11)

sn The question indicates that they had been murmuring against Aaron, that is, expressing disloyalty and challenging his leadership. But it is actually against the Lord that they had been murmuring because the Lord had put Aaron in that position.

(0.44) (Exo 32:1)

tn The imperative means “arise.” It could be serving here as an interjection, getting Aaron’s attention. But it might also have the force of prompting him to get busy.

(0.44) (Exo 29:9)

tc Hebrew has both the objective pronoun “them” and the names “Aaron and his sons.” Neither the LXX nor Leviticus 8:13 has “Aaron and his sons,” suggesting that this may have been a later gloss in the text.

(0.44) (Exo 7:2)

sn The distinct emphasis is important. Aaron will speak to the people and Pharaoh what Moses tells him, and Moses will speak to Aaron what God commands him. The use of “command” keeps everything in perspective for Moses’ position.

(0.44) (2Ch 13:10)

tn Heb “and priests serving the Lord [are] the sons of Aaron and the Levites in the work.”

(0.44) (1Ch 6:54)

tn Heb “and these were their dwelling places according to their encampments in their territory to the sons of Aaron.”

(0.44) (1Sa 2:28)

tn Heb “him”; the referent (Eli’s ancestor, i.e., Aaron) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

(0.44) (Jos 21:10)

tn Heb “and it belonged to the sons of Aaron, from the Kohathite clans, from the sons of Levi.”

(0.44) (Num 16:22)

sn It is Moses and Aaron who prostrate themselves; they have the good of the people at heart.

(0.43) (Lev 8:13)

sn Notice that the priestly garments of Aaron’s sons are quite limited compared to those of Aaron himself, the high priest (cf. vv. 7-9 above). The terms for “tunic” and “sash” are the same but not the headgear (cf. Exod 28:40; 29:8-9; 39:27-29).

(0.43) (Lev 6:14)

tn Heb “offering it, the sons of Aaron.” The verb is a Hiphil infinitive absolute, which is used here in place of the finite verb as either a jussive (GKC 346 §113.cc, “let the sons of Aaron offer”) or more likely an injunctive in light of the verbs that follow (Joüon 2:430 §123.v, “the sons of Aaron shall/must offer”).

(0.43) (Exo 7:1)

tn The word נְבִיאֶךָ (neviʾekha, “your prophet”) recalls 4:16. Moses was to be like God to Aaron, and Aaron was to speak for him. This indicates that the idea of a “prophet” was of one who spoke for God, an idea with which Moses and Aaron and the readers of Exodus are assumed to be familiar.

(0.38) (Exo 32:2)

sn B. Jacob (Exodus, 937-38) argues that Aaron simply did not have the resolution that Moses did, and wanting to keep peace he gave in to the crowd. He also tries to explain that Aaron was wanting to show their folly through the deed. U. Cassuto also says that Aaron’s request for the gold was a form of procrastination, but that the people quickly did it and so he had no alternative but to go through with it (Exodus, 412). These may be right, since Aaron fully understood what was wrong with this, and what the program was all about. The text gives no strong indication to support these ideas, but there are enough hints from the way Aaron does things to warrant such a conclusion.

(0.37) (Luk 1:5)

sn It was not unusual for a priest to have a wife from a priestly family (a descendant of Aaron); this was regarded as a special blessing.



TIP #15: To dig deeper, please read related articles at bible.org (via Articles Tab). [ALL]
created in 0.05 seconds
powered by bible.org