(0.02) | (Exo 38:31) | 1 sn The bronze altar is the altar for the burnt offering; the large bronze basin is not included here in the list. |
(0.02) | (Exo 37:19) | 1 tn Heb “the one branch.” But the repetition of “one…one” means here one after another, or the “first” and then the “next.” |
(0.02) | (Exo 35:10) | 1 tn Heb “wise of heart”; here also “heart” would be a genitive of specification, showing that there were those who could make skillful decisions. |
(0.02) | (Exo 35:21) | 2 tn The verb means “lift up, bear, carry.” Here the subject is “heart” or will, and so the expression describes one moved within to act. |
(0.02) | (Exo 34:35) | 2 tn Verbs of seeing often take two accusatives. Here, the second is the noun clause explaining what it was about the face that they saw. |
(0.02) | (Exo 34:15) | 1 tn The sentence begins simply “lest you make a covenant”; it is undoubtedly a continuation of the imperative introduced earlier, and so that is supplied here. |
(0.02) | (Exo 34:10) | 1 tn Here again is a use of the futur instans participle; the deictic particle plus the pronoun precedes the participle, showing what is about to happen. |
(0.02) | (Exo 34:1) | 3 tn The perfect tense with vav consecutive makes the value of this verb equal to an imperfect tense, probably a simple future here. |
(0.02) | (Exo 33:5) | 5 tn This last clause begins with the interrogative “what,” but it is used here as an indirect interrogative. It introduces a noun clause, the object of the verb “know.” |
(0.02) | (Exo 32:12) | 1 tn The question is rhetorical; it really forms an affirmation that is used here as a reason for the request (see GKC 474 §150.e). |
(0.02) | (Exo 32:1) | 6 tn The plural translation is required here (although the form itself could be singular in meaning) because the verb that follows in the relative clause is a plural verb. |
(0.02) | (Exo 30:10) | 3 sn The phrase “most holy to the Lord” means that the altar cannot be used for any other purpose than what is stated here. |
(0.02) | (Exo 25:22) | 2 tn The verb is placed here in the text: “and I will speak”; it has been moved in this translation to be closer to the direct object clause. |
(0.02) | (Exo 25:19) | 2 tn The use of זֶה (zeh) repeated here expresses the reciprocal ideas of “the one” and “the other” (see R. J. Williams, Hebrew Syntax, 26, §132). |
(0.02) | (Exo 25:17) | 2 tn After verbs of making or producing, the accusative (like “gold” here) may be used to express the material from which something is made (see GKC 371 §117.hh). |
(0.02) | (Exo 25:11) | 1 tn The verbs throughout here are perfect tenses with the vav (ו) consecutives. They are equal to the imperfect tense of instruction and/or injunction. |
(0.02) | (Exo 25:11) | 2 tn Here the verb is an imperfect tense; for the perfect sequence to work the verb would have to be at the front of the clause. |
(0.02) | (Exo 24:14) | 3 tn The imperfect tense here has the nuance of potential imperfect. In the absence of Moses and Joshua, Aaron and Hur will be available. |
(0.02) | (Exo 23:3) | 1 tn The point here is one of false sympathy and honor, the bad sense of the word הָדַר (hadar; see S. R. Driver, Exodus, 237). |
(0.02) | (Exo 22:23) | 3 tn Here is the normal use of the infinitive absolute with the imperfect tense to emphasize the verb: “I will surely hear,” implying, “I will surely respond.” |