Discovery Box| (0.50) | (Deu 7:26) | 4 tn Heb “detesting you must detest and abhorring you must abhor.” Both verbs are preceded by a cognate infinitive absolute indicating emphasis. |
| (0.50) | (Num 22:11) | 3 tn The verb is the Piel perfect with vav (ו) consecutive. It either carries the force of an imperfect tense, or it may be subordinated to the preceding verbs. |
| (0.50) | (Num 16:31) | 2 tn The infinitive construct with the preposition ל (lamed) functions here as the direct object of the preceding infinitive. It tells what he finished. |
| (0.50) | (Num 13:2) | 1 tn The imperfect tense with the conjunction is here subordinated to the preceding imperative to form the purpose clause. It can thus be translated “send…to investigate.” |
| (0.50) | (Num 9:4) | 2 tn The infinitive construct functions as the direct object of the preceding verb (a Hebrew complementary usage), answering the question of what he said. |
| (0.50) | (Num 8:17) | 1 tn The idiomatic “on the day of” precedes the infinitive construct of נָכָה (nakhah) to form the temporal clause: “in the day of my striking…” becomes “when I struck.” |
| (0.50) | (Num 5:4) | 1 tn The perfect tense is here given a past perfect nuance to stress that the word of the Lord preceded the obedience. |
| (0.50) | (Num 4:15) | 2 tn The Piel infinitive construct with the preposition serves as the direct object of the preceding verbal form, answering the question of what it was that they finished. |
| (0.50) | (Num 3:16) | 2 tn The Pual perfect may be given the past perfect translation in this sentence because the act of commanding preceded the act of numbering. |
| (0.50) | (Exo 40:32) | 1 tn The construction is the infinitive construct with the temporal preposition and the suffixed subjective genitive. This temporal clause indicates that the verb in the preceding verse was frequentative. |
| (0.50) | (Exo 34:10) | 1 tn Here again is a use of the futur instans participle; the deictic particle plus the pronoun precedes the participle, showing what is about to happen. |
| (0.50) | (Exo 33:5) | 1 tn The verse simply begins “And Yahweh said.” But it is clearly meant to be explanatory for the preceding action of the people. |
| (0.50) | (Exo 18:22) | 1 tn The form is the perfect tense with the vav (ו) consecutive, making it equivalent to the imperfect of instruction in the preceding verse. |
| (0.50) | (Exo 18:23) | 1 tn The form is a Piel perfect with vav (ו) consecutive; it carries the same nuance as the preceding imperfect in the conditional clause. |
| (0.50) | (Exo 10:11) | 3 tn The suffix on the sign of the accusative refers in a general sense to the idea contained in the preceding clause (see GKC 440-41 §135.p). |
| (0.50) | (Exo 10:5) | 5 tn הַנִּשְׁאֶרֶת (hannishʾeret) parallels (by apposition) and adds further emphasis to the preceding two words; it is the Niphal participle, meaning “that which is left over.” |
| (0.50) | (Exo 4:18) | 5 tn This verb is parallel to the preceding cohortative and so also expresses purpose: “let me go that I may return…and that I may see.” |
| (0.50) | (Gen 47:20) | 1 tn The Hebrew text connects this clause with the preceding one with a causal particle (כִּי, ki). The translation divides the clauses into two sentences for stylistic reasons. |
| (0.50) | (Gen 44:3) | 2 tn Heb “and the men were sent off, they and their donkeys.” This clause, like the preceding one, has the subject before the verb, indicating synchronic action. |
| (0.50) | (Gen 43:8) | 2 tn After the preceding cohortatives, the prefixed verbal form (either imperfect or cohortative) with the prefixed conjunction here indicates purpose or result. |
