Discovery Box| (0.30) | (2Co 7:7) | 1 tn Because of the length and complexity of this Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation by supplying the phrase “We were encouraged.” |
| (0.30) | (2Co 8:6) | 1 tn A new sentence was started here in the translation and the word “thus” was supplied to indicate that it expresses the result of the previous clause. |
| (0.30) | (2Co 4:14) | 1 tn Grk “speak, because.” A new sentence was started here in the translation, with the words “We do so” supplied to preserve the connection with the preceding statement. |
| (0.30) | (2Co 4:9) | 2 tn Or “badly hurt.” It is possible to interpret καταβαλλόμενοι (kataballomenoi) here as “badly hurt”: “[we are] badly hurt, but not destroyed” (L&N 20.21). |
| (0.30) | (2Co 4:2) | 1 tn L&N 13.156; the word can also mean “to assert opposition to,” thus here “we have denounced” (L&N 33.220). |
| (0.30) | (2Co 1:23) | 3 sn Paul had promised to come again to visit (see 2 Cor 1:15, 24) but explains here why he had changed his plans. |
| (0.30) | (2Co 1:5) | 2 tn I.e., suffering incurred by Paul as a consequence of his relationship to Christ. The genitive could be considered to have a causative nuance here. |
| (0.30) | (2Co 1:5) | 1 tn This Greek word translated “sufferings” here (πάθημα, pathēma) is a different one than the one Paul uses for his own afflictions/persecutions (θλῖψις, thlipsis) in v. 4. |
| (0.30) | (1Co 1:8) | 1 tn Grk “who,” referring to Christ. Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 10:17) | 2 tn The genitive could be understood as either subjective (“Christ does the speaking”) or objective (“Christ is spoken about”), but the latter is more likely here. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 9:16) | 1 sn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 9:18) | 1 sn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 9:4) | 1 tn Grk “of whom.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 9:5) | 1 tn Grk “of whom are the fathers.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, a new sentence was started here in the translation. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 8:37) | 2 tn Here the referent could be either God or Christ, but in v. 39 it is God’s love that is mentioned. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 8:33) | 1 sn An allusion to Isa 50:8 where the reference is singular; Paul applies this to all believers (“God’s elect” is plural here). |
| (0.30) | (Rom 8:12) | 1 tn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 7:25) | 2 tn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 7:3) | 1 tn There is a double connective here that cannot be easily preserved in English: “consequently therefore,” emphasizing the conclusion of what he has been arguing. |
| (0.30) | (Rom 6:9) | 2 tn The present tense here has been translated as a futuristic present (see ExSyn 536, where this verse is listed as an example). |
