Discovery Box| (0.50) | (Job 6:19) | 3 tn The words “for these streams” are supplied from context to complete the thought and make the connection with the preceding context. |
| (0.50) | (Job 6:10) | 2 tn In the apodosis of conditional clauses (which must be supplied from the context preceding), the cohortative expresses the consequence (see GKC 320 §108.d). |
| (0.50) | (Job 5:4) | 4 tn The text simply says “and there is no deliverer.” The entire clause could be subordinated to the preceding clause, and rendered simply “without a deliverer.” |
| (0.50) | (Job 1:11) | 1 tn The particle אוּלָם (ʾulam, “but”) serves to restrict the clause in relation to the preceding clause (IBHS 671-73 §39.3.5e, n. 107). |
| (0.50) | (2Ch 30:8) | 3 tn Heb “so that the rage of his anger might turn from you.” The jussive with vav conjunctive indicates purpose/result after the preceding imperative. |
| (0.50) | (2Ch 29:10) | 2 tn Heb “so that the rage of his anger might turn from us.” The jussive with vav (ו) conjunctive indicates purpose/result after the preceding statement of intention. |
| (0.50) | (1Ch 17:21) | 2 tn Heb “whose God,” or “because God.” In the Hebrew text this clause is subordinated to what precedes. The clauses are separated in the translation for stylistic reasons. |
| (0.50) | (2Ki 25:12) | 1 tn Heb “the captain of the royal guard.” However, the subject is clear from the preceding and contemporary English style would normally avoid repeating the proper name and title. |
| (0.50) | (2Ki 6:10) | 1 tn The vav + perfect here indicates action contemporary with the preceding main verb (“sent”). See IBHS 533-34 §32.2.3e. |
| (0.50) | (2Ki 3:4) | 2 tn The vav + perfect here indicates customary action contemporary with the situation described in the preceding main clause. See IBHS 533-34 §32.2.3e. |
| (0.50) | (1Ki 4:24) | 1 tn Heb “because.” The words “his royal court was so large” are added to facilitate the logical connection with the preceding verse. |
| (0.50) | (2Sa 13:18) | 3 tn The Hebrew verb is a perfect with nonconsecutive vav, probably indicating an action (locking the door) that complements the preceding one (pushing her out the door). |
| (0.50) | (2Sa 7:23) | 2 tn Heb “whose God” or “because God.” In the Hebrew text this clause is subordinated to what precedes. The clauses are separated in the translation for stylistic reasons. |
| (0.50) | (1Sa 2:8) | 2 tn The imperfect verbal form, which is parallel to the participle in the preceding line, is best understood here as indicating what typically happens. |
| (0.50) | (Rut 2:9) | 9 tn The imperfect here either indicates characteristic or typical activity, or anterior future, referring to a future action (drawing water) which logically precedes another future action (drinking). |
| (0.50) | (Jdg 11:35) | 1 tn Heb “you have brought me very low,” or “you have knocked me to my knees.” The infinitive absolute precedes the verb for emphasis. |
| (0.50) | (Jdg 4:4) | 1 tn Heb “ a woman, a prophetess.” In Hebrew idiom the generic “woman” sometimes precedes the more specific designation. See GKC 437-38 §135.b. |
| (0.50) | (Jos 10:21) | 2 tc Heb “No man.” The lamed (ל) prefixed to אִישׁ (ʾish, “man”) is probably dittographic (note the immediately preceding יִשְׂרָאֵל [yisraʾel] which ends in lamed, ל); cf. the LXX. |
| (0.50) | (Jos 2:22) | 3 tn Heb “the ones chasing them.” This has been rendered as “their pursuers” in the translation to avoid redundancy with the preceding clause. |
| (0.50) | (Deu 29:2) | 1 tn The Hebrew text includes “to your eyes,” but this is redundant in English style (cf. the preceding “you have seen”) and is omitted in the translation. |
