Texts Notes Verse List Exact Search
Results 141 - 160 of 860 for questions (0.000 seconds)
Jump to page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next Last
  Discovery Box
(0.35) (Gen 42:28)

tn Heb “What is this God has done to us?” The demonstrative pronoun (“this”) adds emphasis to the question.

(0.35) (Gen 29:15)

tn The verb is the perfect with the vav (ו) consecutive; the nuance in the question is deliberative.

(0.35) (Act 26:28)

sn The question “In such a short time are you persuading me to become a Christian?” was probably a ploy on Agrippa’s part to deflect Paul from his call for a decision. Note also how the tables have turned: Agrippa was brought in to hear Paul’s defense, and now ends up defending himself. The questioner is now being questioned.

(0.35) (Job 20:4)

tn The MT has “Do you not know?” The question can be interpreted as a rhetorical question affirming that Job must know this. The question serves to express the conviction that the contents are well-known to the audience (see GKC 474 §150.e).

(0.35) (Job 3:20)

sn In vv. 11, 12, and 16 there was the first series of questions in which Job himself was in question. Now the questions are more general for all mankind—why should the sufferers in general have been afflicted with life?

(0.35) (Gen 3:14)

sn Note that God asks no question of the serpent, does not call for confession, as he did to the man and the woman; there is only the announcement of the curse. The order in this section is chiastic: The man is questioned, the woman is questioned, the serpent is cursed, sentence is passed on the woman, sentence is passed on the man.

(0.30) (Luk 11:7)

tn The syntax of vv. 6-7 is complex. In the Greek text Jesus’ words in v. 6 begin as a question. Some see Jesus’ question ending at v. 6, but the reply starting in v. 8 favors extending the question through the entire illustration. The translation breaks up the long sentence at the beginning of v. 7 and translates Jesus’ words as a statement for reasons of English style.

(0.30) (Amo 8:8)

tn The entire verse is phrased in a series of rhetorical questions that anticipate the answer, “Of course!” (For example, the first line reads, “Because of this will the earth not quake?”). The rhetorical questions entrap the listener in the logic of the judgment of God (cf. 3:3-6; 9:7). The rhetorical questions have been converted to affirmative statements in the translation for clarity.

(0.30) (Jer 3:1)

tn Heb “Returning to me.” The form is the bare infinitive, which the KJV and ASV have interpreted as an imperative: “Yet, return to me!” However, it is more likely that a question is intended, expressing surprise in the light of the law alluded to and the facts cited. For the use of the infinitive absolute in the place of a finite verb, cf. GKC 346 §113.ee. For the introduction of a question without a question marker, cf. GKC 473 §150.a.

(0.30) (Isa 50:1)

sn The Lord admits he did divorce Zion, but that too was the result of the nation’s sins. The force of the earlier rhetorical question comes into clearer focus now. The question does not imply that a certificate does not exist and that no divorce occurred. Rather, the question asks for the certificate to be produced so the accuser can see the reason for the divorce in black and white. The Lord did not put Zion away arbitrarily.

(0.30) (Job 9:2)

sn The point of Job’s rhetorical question is that man cannot be justified as against God because God is too powerful and too clever—he controls the universe. He is discussing now the question that Eliphaz raised in 4:17. Peake observes that Job is raising the question of whether something is right because God says it is right, or that God declares it right because it is right.

(0.30) (2Co 8:23)

tn Grk “If concerning Titus” (εἴτε ὑπὲρ Τίτου, eite huper Titou); the Greek sentence opens with an ellipsis which must be supplied: If [there is any question] about Titus.”

(0.30) (2Co 1:17)

tn The Greek construction anticipates a negative answer. This is indicated in the translation by the ‘tag’ question “did I?” at the end of the sentence.

(0.30) (Act 23:29)

sn With reference to controversial questions. Note how the “neutral” Roman authorities saw the issue. This was a religious rather than a civil dispute. See Acts 18:15.

(0.30) (Act 8:33)

sn The rhetorical question suggests the insensitivity of this generation for its act against God’s servant, who was slain unjustly as he was silent.

(0.30) (Act 5:4)

tn The negative interrogative particle οὐχί (ouchi) expects a positive reply to this question and the following one (“And when it was sold, was it not at your disposal?”).

(0.30) (Act 4:9)

tn This clause is a first class condition. It assumes for the sake of argument that this is what they were being questioned about.

(0.30) (Luk 20:37)

sn See Exod 3:6. Jesus used a common form of rabbinic citation here to refer to the passage in question.

(0.30) (Luk 20:34)

tn Here καί (kai) has been translated as “so” to indicate that Jesus’ response is a result of their framing of the question.

(0.30) (Luk 20:25)

tn Here δέ (de) has been translated as “so” to indicate that Jesus’ pronouncement results from the opponents’ answer to his question.



TIP #02: Try using wildcards "*" or "?" for b?tter wor* searches. [ALL]
created in 0.05 seconds
powered by bible.org