Discovery Box| (0.50) | (Num 23:3) | 3 tn The verb is the perfect tense with vav (ו) consecutive. This clause is dependent on the clause that precedes it. |
| (0.50) | (Num 18:31) | 1 tn The verb is the perfect tense with vav (ו) consecutive; it functions as the equivalent of the imperfect of permission. |
| (0.50) | (Num 18:4) | 1 tn Now the sentence uses the Niphal perfect with a vav (ו) consecutive from the same root לָוָה (lavah). |
| (0.50) | (Num 10:3) | 1 tn The perfect tense with vav (ו) consecutive is here subordinated as a temporal clause to the following similar verbal construction. |
| (0.50) | (Num 6:9) | 2 tn The verb is the Piel perfect with a vav (ו) consecutive; it continues the idea within the conditional clause. |
| (0.50) | (Lev 15:10) | 1 tn Heb “which shall be under him.” The verb is perhaps a future perfect, “which shall have been.” |
| (0.50) | (Exo 34:35) | 1 tn Now the perfect tense with vav consecutive is subordinated to the next clause, “Moses returned the veil….” |
| (0.50) | (Exo 25:37) | 3 tn This is a Hiphil perfect with vav consecutive, from אוֹר (ʾor, “light”), and in the causative, “to light, give light.” |
| (0.50) | (Exo 19:12) | 1 tn The verb is a Hiphil perfect (“make borders”) with vav (ו) consecutive, following the sequence of instructions. |
| (0.50) | (Exo 10:13) | 5 tn The verb here is a past perfect, indicting that the locusts had arrived before the day came. |
| (0.50) | (Exo 9:18) | 3 tn The form הִוָּסְדָה (hivvasedah) is perhaps a rare Niphal perfect and not an infinitive (U. Cassuto, Exodus, 117). |
| (0.50) | (Exo 7:5) | 1 tn The emphasis on sequence is clear because the form is the perfect tense with the vav consecutive. |
| (0.50) | (Exo 3:16) | 3 tn The form is the Niphal perfect of the verb “to see.” See the note on “appeared” in 3:2. |
| (0.50) | (Gen 49:11) | 1 tn The perfect verbal form is used rhetorically, describing coming events as though they have already taken place. |
| (0.50) | (Gen 43:25) | 2 tn The action precedes the action of preparing the gift, and so must be translated as past perfect. |
| (0.50) | (Gen 41:35) | 4 tn The perfect with vav (ו) consecutive carries the same force as the sequence of jussives before it. |
| (0.50) | (Gen 32:18) | 1 tn The form is the perfect tense with the vav (ו) consecutive; it has the nuance of an imperfect of instruction. |
| (0.50) | (Gen 32:12) | 3 tn The form is the perfect tense with a vav (ו) consecutive, carrying the nuance of the preceding verb forward. |
| (0.50) | (Gen 29:15) | 1 tn The verb is the perfect with the vav (ו) consecutive; the nuance in the question is deliberative. |
| (0.50) | (Gen 29:8) | 1 tn The perfect verbal forms with the vav (ו) consecutive carry on the sequence begun by the initial imperfect form. |
