⁷ tn The vav introduces a logical conclusion.

¹ tn The conclusion or apodosis is now introduced.

¹ tn Grk “to whom,” introducing a subordinate relative clause.

¹ sn See Heb 5:2 where this concept was introduced.

² tn The interrogative particle introducing this question expects a negative reply.

² tn The interrogative particle introducing this question expects a negative reply.

¹ tn The optative clause is introduced with the particle לוּ (lu).

¹ tn The disjunctive vav introduces a circumstantial clause here.

¹ tn The clause is introduced with the particle הִנֵּה (hinneh), introducing a foundational clause for the coming imperative: “since…do.”

¹ tn Disjunctive questions are introduced with the sign of the interrogative; the second part is introduced with אוֹ (ʾo, see GKC 475 §150.g).

¹ tn The disjunctive clause (introduced by a conjunction with the subject, followed by the predicate) here introduces a new scene in the story.

² tn The construction uses הֵן (hen) to introduce the foundational clause (“since…”), and וְהִנֵּה (v^ehinneh) to introduce the main clause (“then look…”).

¹ tn Here καί (kai) has been translated as “now” because the clause it introduces is clearly resumptive.

¹ tn Grk “and.” The Greek conjunction καί (kai) introduces the apodosis of the conditional sentence.

⁴ tn Greek has “and their.” As introducing a synonymous parallel, it is superfluous in English.

² tn Grk “because of whom,” introducing a subordinate clause to the first part of the verse.

¹ tn Grk “say what is fitting for sound teaching” (introducing the behavior called for in this chapter.).

² tn The question in Greek introduced with οὐχί (ouchi) expects a positive reply.

² tn This introduces a second class (contrary to fact) condition in the Greek text.

² tn This introduces a second class (contrary to fact) condition in the Greek text.