Discovery Box| (0.67) | (Psa 96:3) | 1 tn The verb “tell” is understood by ellipsis (note the preceding line). |
| (0.67) | (Psa 51:7) | 3 tn After the preceding imperfect, the imperfect with vav (ו) conjunctive indicates result. |
| (0.67) | (Psa 34:19) | 4 tn Heb “him,” agreeing with the singular form in the preceding line. |
| (0.67) | (Psa 5:11) | 4 tn As in the preceding line, the prefixed verbal form is a jussive of wish or prayer. |
| (0.67) | (Job 17:16) | 1 sn It is natural to assume that this verse continues the interrogative clause of the preceding verse. |
| (0.67) | (Job 8:5) | 1 tn “But” is supplied to show the contrast between this verse and the preceding line. |
| (0.67) | (2Ch 30:6) | 3 tn The jussive with vav conjunctive indicates purpose/result after the preceding imperative. |
| (0.67) | (1Ch 16:24) | 1 tn The verb “tell” is understood by ellipsis (note the preceding line). |
| (0.67) | (2Ki 19:26) | 3 tn Heb “[they are] grass on the rooftops.” See the preceding note. |
| (0.67) | (2Sa 18:18) | 2 tn This disjunctive clause (conjunction + subject + verb) describes an occurrence that preceded the events just narrated. |
| (0.67) | (1Sa 15:22) | 4 tn The expression “is better” is understood here by ellipsis (see the immediately preceding statement). |
| (0.67) | (1Sa 2:10) | 6 sn The anointed one is the anticipated king of Israel, as the preceding line makes clear. |
| (0.67) | (Rut 4:21) | 1 sn Salmon appears to be an alternate spelling of Salmah in the preceding line. |
| (0.67) | (Rut 2:2) | 2 tn Following the preceding cohortative, the cohortative with vav conjunctive indicates purpose/result. |
| (0.67) | (Jos 17:4) | 2 tn Heb “he.” The referent is probably Joshua, although Eleazar is mentioned first in the preceding list. |
| (0.67) | (Jos 1:17) | 2 tn Or “Only.” Here and in v. 18 this word qualifies what precedes (see also v. 7). |
| (0.67) | (Jos 1:18) | 2 tn Or “Only.” Here and in v. 17 this word qualifies what precedes (see also v. 7). |
| (0.67) | (Num 22:30) | 1 tn Here the Hiphil perfect is preceded by the Hiphil infinitive absolute for emphasis in the sentence. |
| (0.67) | (Num 20:5) | 2 tn Here also the infinitive construct (Hiphil) forms the subordinate clause of the preceding interrogative clause. |
| (0.67) | (Num 14:42) | 1 tn This verb could also be subordinated to the preceding: “that you be not smitten.” |
