Discovery BoxMalachi 2:6 
Context2:6 He taught what was true; 1 sinful words were not found on his lips. He walked with me in peace and integrity, and he turned many people away from sin.
Malachi 2:9
Context2:9 “Therefore, I have caused you to be ignored and belittled before all people to the extent to which you are not following after me and are showing partiality in your 2 instruction.”
Malachi 2:16
Context2:16 “I hate divorce,” 3 says the Lord God of Israel, “and the one who is guilty of violence,” 4 says the Lord who rules over all. “Pay attention to your conscience, and do not be unfaithful.”
Malachi 3:7
Context3:7 From the days of your ancestors you have ignored 5 my commandments 6 and have not kept them! Return to me, and I will return to you,” says the Lord who rules over all. “But you say, ‘How should we return?’
Malachi 3:18
Context3:18 Then once more you will see that I make a distinction between 7 the righteous and the wicked, between the one who serves God and the one who does not.
1 tn Heb “True teaching was in his mouth”; cf. NASB, NRSV “True instruction (doctrine NAB) was in his mouth.”
2 tn Heb “in the instruction” (so NASB). The Hebrew article is used here as a possessive pronoun (cf. NRSV, NLT).
3 tc The verb שָׂנֵא (sane’) appears to be a third person form, “he hates,” which makes little sense in the context, unless one emends the following word to a third person verb as well. Then one might translate, “he [who] hates [his wife] [and] divorces her…is guilty of violence.” A similar translation is advocated by M. A. Shields, “Syncretism and Divorce in Malachi 2,10-16,” ZAW 111 (1999): 81-85. However, it is possible that the first person pronoun אָנֹכִי (’anokhi, “I”) has accidentally dropped from the text after כִּי (ki). If one restores the pronoun, the form שָׂנֵא can be taken as a participle and the text translated, “for I hate” (so NAB, NASB, NRSV, NLT).
sn Though the statement “I hate divorce” may (and should) be understood as a comprehensive biblical principle, the immediate context suggests that the divorce in view is that of one Jewish person by another in order to undertake subsequent marriages. The injunction here by no means contradicts Ezra’s commands to Jewish men to divorce their heathen wives (Ezra 9–10).
4 tn Heb “him who covers his garment with violence” (similar ASV, NRSV). Here “garment” is a metaphor for appearance and “violence” a metonymy of effect for cause. God views divorce as an act of violence against the victim.
5 tn Heb “turned aside from.”
6 tn Or “statutes” (so NAB, NASB, NRSV); NIV “decrees”; NLT “laws.”
7 tn Heb “you will see between.” Cf. NRSV, TEV, NLT “see the difference.”
