Luke 4:38
Context4:38 After Jesus left 1 the synagogue, he entered Simon’s house. Now Simon’s mother-in-law was suffering from a high fever, and they asked Jesus 2 to help her. 3
Luke 6:4
Context6:4 how he entered the house of God, took 4 and ate the sacred bread, 5 which is not lawful 6 for any to eat but the priests alone, and 7 gave it to his companions?” 8
Luke 17:27
Context17:27 People 9 were eating, 10 they were drinking, they were marrying, they were being given in marriage – right up to the day Noah entered the ark. Then 11 the flood came and destroyed them all. 12
Luke 22:10
Context22:10 He said to them, “Listen, 13 when you have entered the city, a man carrying a jar of water 14 will meet you. 15 Follow him into the house that he enters,
1 tn Grk “Arising from the synagogue, he entered.” The participle ἀναστάς (anastas) has been taken temporally here, and the referent (Jesus) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
2 tn Grk “him”; the referent (Jesus) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
3 tn Grk “they asked him about her.” It is clear from the context that they were concerned about her physical condition. The verb “to help” in the translation makes this explicit.
4 tn Grk “and took.”
5 tn Grk “the bread of presentation.”
sn The sacred bread refers to the “bread of presentation,” “showbread,” or “bread of the Presence,” twelve loaves prepared weekly for the tabernacle and later, the temple. See Exod 25:30; 35:13; 39:36; Lev 24:5-9. Each loaf was made from 3 quarts (3.5 liters; Heb “two tenths of an ephah”) of fine flour. The loaves were placed on a table in the holy place of the tabernacle, on the north side opposite the lampstand (Exod 26:35). It was the duty of the priest each Sabbath to place fresh bread on the table; the loaves from the previous week were then given to Aaron and his descendants, who ate them in the holy place, because they were considered sacred (Lev 24:9). These were the loaves that David requested from Ahimelech for himself and his men (1 Sam 21:1-6; cf. also Matt 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-28).
6 sn Jesus’ response to the charge that what his disciples were doing was not lawful is one of analogy: ‘If David did it for his troops in a time of need, then so can I with my disciples.’ Jesus is clear that on the surface there was a violation here. What is not as clear is whether he is arguing a “greater need” makes this permissible or that this was within the intention of the law all along.
7 tc Most
8 tc The Western ms D adds here a full saying that reads, “On the same day, as he saw someone working on the Sabbath he said, ‘Man, if you know what you are doing, you are blessed, but if you do not know, you are cursed and a violator of the law.’” Though this is not well enough attested to be considered authentic, many commentators have debated whether this saying might go back to Jesus. Most reject it, though it does have wording that looks like Rom 2:25, 27 and Jas 2:11.
sn See 1 Sam 21:1-6.
9 tn Grk “They.” The plural in Greek is indefinite, referring to people in general.
10 tn These verbs (“eating… drinking… marrying… being given in marriage”) are all progressive imperfects, describing action in progress at that time.
11 tn Here καί (kai) has been translated as “then” to indicate the implied sequence of events within the narrative.
12 sn Like that flood came and destroyed them all, the coming judgment associated with the Son of Man will condemn many.
13 tn Grk “behold.”
14 sn Since women usually carried these jars, it would have been no problem for Peter and John to recognize the man Jesus was referring to.
15 sn Jesus is portrayed throughout Luke 22-23 as very aware of what will happen, almost directing events. Here this is indicated by his prediction that a man carrying a jar of water will meet you.