John 1:47
Context1:47 Jesus saw Nathanael coming toward him and exclaimed, 1 “Look, a true Israelite in whom there is no deceit!” 2
John 3:34
Context3:34 For the one whom God has sent 3 speaks the words of God, for he does not give the Spirit sparingly. 4
John 5:38
Context5:38 nor do you have his word residing in you, because you do not believe the one whom he sent.
John 6:68
Context6:68 Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom would we go? You have the words of eternal life.
John 9:19
Context9:19 They asked the parents, 5 “Is this your son, whom you say 6 was born blind? Then how does he now see?”
John 10:35
Context10:35 If those people to whom the word of God came were called ‘gods’ (and the scripture cannot be broken), 7
John 12:1
Context12:1 Then, six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany, where Lazarus lived, whom he 8 had raised from the dead.
John 13:25
Context13:25 Then the disciple whom Jesus loved 9 leaned back against Jesus’ chest and asked him, “Lord, who is it?”
John 17:3
Context17:3 Now this 10 is eternal life 11 – that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, 12 whom you sent.
1 tn Grk “said about him.”
2 tn Or “treachery.”
sn An allusion to Ps 32:2.
3 tn That is, Christ.
4 tn Grk “for not by measure does he give the Spirit” (an idiom). Leviticus Rabbah 15:2 states: “The Holy Spirit rested on the prophets by measure.” Jesus is contrasted to this. The Spirit rests upon him without measure.
5 tn Grk “and they asked them, saying”; the referent (the parents) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
6 tn The Greek pronoun and verb are both plural (both parents are addressed).
7 sn The parenthetical note And the scripture cannot be broken belongs to Jesus’ words rather than the author’s. Not only does Jesus appeal to the OT to defend himself against the charge of blasphemy, but he also adds that the scripture cannot be “broken.” In this context he does not explain precisely what is meant by “broken,” but it is not too hard to determine. Jesus’ argument depended on the exact word used in the context of Ps 82:6. If any other word for “judge” had been used in the psalm, his argument would have been meaningless. Since the scriptures do use this word in Ps 82:6, the argument is binding, because they cannot be “broken” in the sense of being shown to be in error.
8 tn Grk “whom Jesus,” but a repetition of the proper name (Jesus) here would be redundant in the English clause structure, so the pronoun (“he”) is substituted in the translation.
9 tn Grk “he”; the referent (the disciple Jesus loved) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
10 tn Using αὕτη δέ (Jauth de) to introduce an explanation is typical Johannine style; it was used before in John 1:19, 3:19, and 15:12.
11 sn This is eternal life. The author here defines eternal life for the readers, although it is worked into the prayer in such a way that many interpreters do not regard it as another of the author’s parenthetical comments. It is not just unending life in the sense of prolonged duration. Rather it is a quality of life, with its quality derived from a relationship with God. Having eternal life is here defined as being in relationship with the Father, the one true God, and Jesus Christ whom the Father sent. Christ (Χριστός, Cristos) is not characteristically attached to Jesus’ name in John’s Gospel; it occurs elsewhere primarily as a title and is used with Jesus’ name only in 1:17. But that is connected to its use here: The statement here in 17:3 enables us to correlate the statement made in 1:18 of the prologue, that Jesus has fully revealed what God is like, with Jesus’ statement in 10:10 that he has come that people might have life, and have it abundantly. These two purposes are really one, according to 17:3, because (abundant) eternal life is defined as knowing (being in relationship with) the Father and the Son. The only way to gain this eternal life, that is, to obtain this knowledge of the Father, is through the Son (cf. 14:6). Although some have pointed to the use of know (γινώσκω, ginwskw) here as evidence of Gnostic influence in the Fourth Gospel, there is a crucial difference: For John this knowledge is not intellectual, but relational. It involves being in relationship.
12 tn Or “and Jesus the Messiah” (Both Greek “Christ” and Hebrew and Aramaic “Messiah” mean “one who has been anointed”).