Genesis 6:2
Context6:2 the sons of God 1 saw that the daughters of humankind were beautiful. Thus they took wives for themselves from any they chose.
Genesis 16:1
Context16:1 Now Sarai, 2 Abram’s wife, had not given birth to any children, 3 but she had an Egyptian servant 4 named Hagar. 5
Genesis 27:13
Context27:13 So his mother told him, “Any curse against you will fall on me, 6 my son! Just obey me! 7 Go and get them for me!”
Genesis 31:7
Context31:7 but your father has humiliated 8 me and changed my wages ten times. But God has not permitted him to do me any harm.
Genesis 31:14
Context31:14 Then Rachel and Leah replied to him, “Do we still have any portion or inheritance 9 in our father’s house?
Genesis 37:4
Context37:4 When Joseph’s 10 brothers saw that their father loved him more than any of them, 11 they hated Joseph 12 and were not able to speak to him kindly. 13
Genesis 48:6
Context48:6 Any children that you father 14 after them will be yours; they will be listed 15 under the names of their brothers in their inheritance. 16
1 sn The Hebrew phrase translated “sons of God” (בְנֵי־הָאֱלֹהִים, bÿne-ha’elohim) occurs only here (Gen 6:2, 4) and in Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7. There are three major interpretations of the phrase here. (1) In the Book of Job the phrase clearly refers to angelic beings. In Gen 6 the “sons of God” are distinct from “humankind,” suggesting they were not human. This is consistent with the use of the phrase in Job. Since the passage speaks of these beings cohabiting with women, they must have taken physical form or possessed the bodies of men. An early Jewish tradition preserved in 1 En. 6-7 elaborates on this angelic revolt and even names the ringleaders. (2) Not all scholars accept the angelic interpretation of the “sons of God,” however. Some argue that the “sons of God” were members of Seth’s line, traced back to God through Adam in Gen 5, while the “daughters of humankind” were descendants of Cain. But, as noted above, the text distinguishes the “sons of God” from humankind (which would include the Sethites as well as the Cainites) and suggests that the “daughters of humankind” are human women in general, not just Cainites. (3) Others identify the “sons of God” as powerful tyrants, perhaps demon-possessed, who viewed themselves as divine and, following the example of Lamech (see Gen 4:19), practiced polygamy. But usage of the phrase “sons of God” in Job militates against this view. For literature on the subject see G. J. Wenham, Genesis (WBC), 1:135.
2 tn The disjunctive clause signals the beginning of a new episode in the story.
3 sn On the cultural background of the story of Sarai’s childlessness see J. Van Seters, “The Problem of Childlessness in Near Eastern Law and the Patriarchs of Israel,” JBL 87 (1968): 401-8.
4 tn The Hebrew term שִׁפְחָה (shifkhah, translated “servant” here and in vv. 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8) refers to a menial female servant.
5 sn The passage records the birth of Ishmael to Abram through an Egyptian woman. The story illustrates the limits of Abram’s faith as he tries to obtain a son through social custom. The barrenness of Sarai poses a challenge to Abram’s faith, just as the famine did in chap. 12. As in chap. 12, an Egyptian figures prominently. (Perhaps Hagar was obtained as a slave during Abram’s stay in Egypt.)
6 tn Heb “upon me your curse.”
7 tn Heb “only listen to my voice.”
8 tn This rare verb means “to make a fool of” someone. It involves deceiving someone so that their public reputation suffers (see Exod 8:25).
9 tn The two nouns may form a hendiadys, meaning “a share in the inheritance” or “a portion to inherit.”
10 tn Heb “his”; the referent (Joseph) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
11 tn Heb “of his brothers.” This is redundant in contemporary English and has been replaced in the translation by the pronoun “them.”
12 tn Heb “him”; the referent (Joseph) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
13 tn Heb “speak to him for peace.”
14 tn Or “you fathered.”
15 tn Heb “called” or “named.”
16 sn Listed under the names of their brothers in their inheritance. This means that any subsequent children of Joseph will be incorporated into the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh.