Exodus 3:3
Context3:3 So Moses thought, 1 “I will turn aside to see 2 this amazing 3 sight. Why does the bush not burn up?” 4
Exodus 23:8
Context23:8 “You must not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds those who see 5 and subverts the words of the righteous.
Exodus 31:2
Context31:2 “See, I have chosen 6 Bezalel son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah,
Exodus 33:23
Context33:23 Then I will take away my hand, and you will see my back, 7 but my face must not be seen.” 8
1 tn Heb “And Moses said.” The implication is that Moses said this to himself.
2 tn The construction uses the cohortative אָסֻרָה־נָּא (’asura-nna’) followed by an imperfect with vav (וְאֶרְאֶה, vÿ’er’eh) to express the purpose or result (logical sequence): “I will turn aside in order that I may see.”
3 tn Heb “great.” The word means something extraordinary here. In using this term Moses revealed his reaction to the strange sight and his anticipation that something special was about to happen. So he turned away from the flock to investigate.
4 tn The verb is an imperfect. Here it has the progressive nuance – the bush is not burning up.
5 tn Heb “blinds the open-eyed.”
6 tn Heb “called by name.” This expression means that the person was specifically chosen for some important task (S. R. Driver, Exodus, 342). See the expression with Cyrus in Isa 45:3-4.
7 tn The plural “my backs” is according to Gesenius an extension plural (compare “face,” a dual in Hebrew). The word denotes a locality in general, but that is composed of numerous parts (see GKC 397 §124.b). W. C. Kaiser says that since God is a spirit, the meaning of this word could just as easily be rendered “after effects” of his presence (“Exodus,” EBC 2:484). As S. R. Driver says, though, while this may indicate just the “afterglow” that he leaves behind him, it was enough to suggest what the full brilliancy of his presence must be (Exodus, 363; see also Job 26:14).
8 tn The Niphal imperfect could simply be rendered “will not be seen,” but given the emphasis of the preceding verses, it is more binding than that, and so a negated obligatory imperfect fits better: “it must not be seen.” It would also be possible to render it with a potential imperfect tense: “it cannot be seen.”