NETBible KJV GRK-HEB XRef Arts Hymns
  Discovery Box

Exodus 12:4

Context
12:4 If any household is too small 1  for a lamb, 2  the man 3  and his next-door neighbor 4  are to take 5  a lamb according to the number of people – you will make your count for the lamb according to how much each one can eat. 6 

Exodus 16:4

Context

16:4 Then the Lord said to Moses, “I am going to rain 7  bread from heaven for you, and the people will go out 8  and gather the amount for each day, so that I may test them. 9  Will they will walk in my law 10  or not?

Exodus 16:29

Context
16:29 See, because the Lord has given you the Sabbath, that is why 11  he is giving you food for two days on the sixth day. Each of you stay where you are; 12  let no one 13  go out of his place on the seventh day.”

Exodus 30:12

Context
30:12 “When you take a census 14  of the Israelites according to their number, 15  then each man is to pay a ransom 16  for his life to the Lord when you number them, 17  so that there will be no plague among them when you number them.

1 sn Later Judaism ruled that “too small” meant fewer than ten (S. R. Driver, Exodus, 88).

2 tn The clause uses the comparative min (מִן) construction: יִמְעַט הַבַּיִת מִהְיֹת מִשֶּׂה (yimat habbayit mihyot miseh, “the house is small from being from a lamb,” or “too small for a lamb”). It clearly means that if there were not enough people in the household to have a lamb by themselves, they should join with another family. For the use of the comparative, see GKC 430 §133.c.

3 tn Heb “he and his neighbor”; the referent (the man) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

4 tn Heb “who is near to his house.”

5 tn The construction uses a perfect tense with a vav (ו) consecutive after a conditional clause: “if the household is too small…then he and his neighbor will take.”

6 tn Heb “[every] man according to his eating.”

sn The reference is normally taken to mean whatever each person could eat. B. Jacob (Exodus, 299) suggests, however, that the reference may not be to each individual person’s appetite, but to each family. Each man who is the head of a household was to determine how much his family could eat, and this in turn would determine how many families shared the lamb.

7 tn The particle הִנְנִי (hinni) before the active participle indicates the imminent future action: “I am about to rain.”

8 tn This verb and the next are the Qal perfect tenses with vav (ו) consecutives; they follow the sequence of the participle, and so are future in orientation. The force here is instruction – “they will go out” or “they are to go out.”

9 tn The verb in the purpose/result clause is the Piel imperfect of נָסָה (nasah), אֲנַסֶּנוּ (’anassenu) – “in order that I may prove them [him].” The giving of the manna will be a test of their obedience to the detailed instructions of God as well as being a test of their faith in him (if they believe him they will not gather too much). In chap. 17 the people will test God, showing that they do not trust him.

10 sn The word “law” here properly means “direction” at this point (S. R. Driver, Exodus, 146), but their obedience here would indicate also whether or not they would be willing to obey when the Law was given at Sinai.

11 sn Noting the rabbinic teaching that the giving of the Sabbath was a sign of God’s love – it was accomplished through the double portion on the sixth day – B. Jacob says, “God made no request unless He provided the means for its execution” (Exodus, 461).

12 tn Heb “remain, a man where he is.”

13 tn Or “Let not anyone go” (see GKC 445 §138.d).

14 tn The expression is “when you take [lift up] the sum [head] of the Israelites.”

15 tn The form is לִפְקֻדֵיהֶם (lifqudehem, “according to those that are numbered of/by them”) from the verb פָּקַד (paqad, “to visit”). But the idea of this word seems more to be that of changing or determining the destiny, and so “appoint” and “number” become clear categories of meaning for the word. Here it simply refers to the census, but when this word is used for a census it often involves mustering an army for a military purpose. Here there is no indication of a war, but it may be laying down the principle that when they should do this, here is the price. B. Jacob (Exodus, 835) uses Num 31 as a good illustration, showing that the warrior was essentially a murderer, if he killed anyone in battle. For this reason his blood was forfeit; if he survived he must pay a כֹּפֶר (kofer) because every human life possesses value and must be atoned for. The payment during the census represented a “presumptive ransom” so that they could not be faulted for what they might do in war.

16 tn The “ransom” is כֹּפֶר (kofer), a word related to words translated “atone” and “atonement.” Here the noun refers to what is paid for the life. The idea is that of delivering or redeeming by a substitute – here the substitute is the money. If they paid the amount, their lives would be safe (W. C. Kaiser, Jr., “Exodus,” EBC 2:473).

17 tn The temporal clause uses a preposition, an infinitive construct, and then an accusative. The subject is supplied: “in numbering them” means “when [you] number them.” The verb could also be rendered “when you muster them.”



TIP #04: Try using range (OT and NT) to better focus your searches. [ALL]
created in 0.10 seconds
powered by bible.org