Ecclesiastes 2:25
Context2:25 For no one 1 can eat and drink 2
or experience joy 3 apart from him. 4
Ecclesiastes 4:9
Context4:9 Two people are better than one,
because they can reap 5 more benefit 6 from their labor.
Ecclesiastes 6:11
Context6:11 The more one argues with words, the less he accomplishes. 7
How does that benefit him? 8
Ecclesiastes 9:18
Context9:18 Wisdom is better than weapons of war,
but one sinner can destroy much that is good.
1 tn Heb “For who can…?” The rhetorical question is an example of negative affirmation, expecting a negative answer: “No one can!” (see E. W. Bullinger, Figures of Speech, 949-51).
2 tn The phrase “and drink” is not in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for stylistic harmonization with v. 24.
3 tn The verb II חוּשׁ (khush, “to enjoy”) is a hapax legomenon which BDB defines as “to feel; to enjoy [with the senses]” on the basis of the context, and the cognates: Arabic “to feel; to perceive [by senses]”; Aramaic חושׁ “to feel pain,” and New Hebrew חושׁ “to feel pain” (BDB 301 s.v. II חֹוּשׁ). HALOT relates the Hebrew root to Akkadian havavu “to be delighted with” (HALOT 300 s.v. II חושׁ 1). The Vulgate renders this term as “to enjoy.” The Greek versions (LXX, Theodotion) and the Syriac Peshitta, however, did not understand this hapax; they rendered it as “to drink,” making some sense of the line by filling out the parallelism “to eat [and drink]” (e.g., Eccl 8:15).
4 tc The MT reads מִמֶּנִּי (mimmenni, “more than I”). However, an alternate textual tradition of מִמֶּנּוּ (mimmennu,“apart from him [= God]”) is preserved in several medieval Hebrew
5 tn Heb “they have.”
6 tn Heb “a good reward.”
7 tn Heb “The more the words, the more the futility.”
8 tn Or “What benefit does man have [in that]?”