Discovery BoxDaniel 11:28 
Context11:28 Then the king of the north 1 will return to his own land with much property. His mind will be set against the holy covenant. He will take action, and then return to his own land.
Daniel 11:30-31
Context11:30 The ships of Kittim 2 will come against him, leaving him disheartened. 3 He will turn back and direct his indignation against the holy covenant. He will return and honor 4 those who forsake the holy covenant. 11:31 His forces 5 will rise up and profane the fortified sanctuary, 6 stopping the daily sacrifice. In its place they will set up 7 the abomination that causes desolation.
Daniel 11:36-37
Context11:36 “Then the king 8 will do as he pleases. He will exalt and magnify himself above every deity and he will utter presumptuous things against the God of gods. He will succeed until the time of 9 wrath is completed, for what has been decreed must occur. 10 11:37 He will not respect 11 the gods of his fathers – not even the god loved by women. 12 He will not respect any god; he will elevate himself above them all.
1 tn Heb “he”; the referent (the king of the north) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
2 sn The name Kittim has various designations in extra-biblical literature. It can refer to a location on the island of Cyprus, or more generally to the island itself, or it can be an inclusive term to refer to parts of the Mediterranean world that lay west of the Middle East (e.g., Rome). For ships of Kittim the Greek OT (LXX) has “Romans,” an interpretation followed by a few English versions (e.g., TEV). A number of times in the Dead Sea Scrolls the word is used in reference to the Romans. Other English versions are more generic: “[ships] of the western coastlands” (NIV, NLT); “from the west” (NCV, CEV).
3 sn This is apparently a reference to the Roman forces, led by Gaius Popilius Laenas, which confronted Antiochus when he came to Egypt and demanded that he withdraw or face the wrath of Rome. Antiochus wisely withdrew from Egypt, albeit in a state of bitter frustration.
4 tn Heb “show regard for.”
5 tn Heb “arms.”
6 tn Heb “the sanctuary, the fortress.”
7 tn Heb “will give.”
8 sn The identity of this king is problematic. If vv. 36-45 continue the description of Antiochus Epiphanes, the account must be viewed as erroneous, since the details do not match what is known of Antiochus’ latter days. Most modern scholars take this view, concluding that this section was written just shortly before the death of Antiochus and that the writer erred on several key points as he tried to predict what would follow the events of his own day. Conservative scholars, however, usually understand the reference to shift at this point to an eschatological figure, viz., the Antichrist. The chronological gap that this would presuppose to be in the narrative is not necessarily a problem, since by all accounts there are many chronological gaps throughout the chapter, as the historical figures intended by such expressions as “king of the north” and “king of the south” repeatedly shift.
9 tn The words “the time of” are added in the translation for clarification.
10 tn Heb “has been done.” The Hebrew verb used here is the perfect of certitude, emphasizing the certainty of fulfillment.
11 tn Heb “consider.”
12 tn Heb “[the one] desired by women.” The referent has been specified in the translation for clarity.
