1:17 So I decided 1 to discern the benefit of 2 wisdom and knowledge over 3 foolish behavior and ideas; 4
however, I concluded 5 that even 6 this endeavor 7 is like 8 trying to chase the wind! 9
2:12 Next, I decided to consider 10 wisdom, as well as foolish behavior and ideas. 11
For what more can the king’s successor do than what the king 12 has already done?
2:15 So I thought to myself, “The fate of the fool will happen even to me! 13
Then what did I gain by becoming so excessively 14 wise?” 15
So I lamented to myself, 16
“The benefits of wisdom 17 are ultimately 18 meaningless!”
9:10 Whatever you find to do with your hands, 19
do it with all your might,
because there is neither work nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom in the grave, 20
the place where you will eventually go. 21
10:10 If an iron axhead 22 is blunt and a workman 23 does not sharpen 24 its edge, 25
he must exert a great deal of effort; 26
so wisdom has the advantage of giving success.
1 tn Heb “gave my heart,” or “set my mind.” See v. 13.
2 tn The phrase “the benefit of” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.
3 tn The word “over” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.
4 tn The terms שִׂכְלוּת (sikhlut, “folly”) and הוֹלֵלוֹת (holelot, “foolishness”) are synonyms. The term שִׂכְלוּת (alternate spelling of סִכְלוּת, sikhlut) refers to foolish behavior (HALOT 755 s.v. סִכְלוּת), while הוֹלֵלוֹת refers to foolish ideas and mental blindness (HALOT 242 s.v. הוֹלֵלוֹת). Qoheleth uses these terms to refer to foolish ideas and self-indulgent pleasures (e.g., Eccl 2:2-3, 12-14; 7:25; 9:3; 10:1, 6, 13).
5 tn Heb “I know.”
6 tn The term גַּם (gam, “even”) is a particle of association and emphasis (HALOT 195 s.v. גַּם).
7 tn This term does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.
8 tn This term does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.
9 tn Heb “striving of wind.”
10 tn Heb “and I turned to see.”
11 sn See 1:17 for the same expression. Throughout 2:1-11, Qoheleth evaluated the merits of merrymaking (2:1-3), accomplishing grand things (2:4-6), amassing great wealth (2:7-8), and secular acquisitions and accomplishments (2:9-10). Now, he reflects on the benefit in life in living wisely and not giving oneself over to frivolous self-indulgence.
12 tc The Hebrew text reads עָשׂוּהוּ (’asuhu, “they have done it”; Qal perfect 3rd person masculine plural from עָשַׂה [’asah] + 3rd person masculine singular suffix). However, many medieval Hebrew
13 tn The emphatic use of the 1st person common singular personal pronoun אֲנִי (’ani, “me”) with the emphatic particle of association גַּם (gam, “even, as well as”; HALOT 195–96 s.v. גַּם) appears to emphasize the 1st person common singular suffix on יִקְרֵנִי (yiqreni) “it will befall [or “happen to”] me” (Qal imperfect 3rd person masculine singular + 1st person common singular suffix from קָרָה, qarah, “to befall; to happen to”); see GKC 438 §135.e. Qoheleth laments not that the fate of the wise man is the same as that of the fool, but that even he himself – the wisest man of all – would fare no better in the end than the most foolish.
14 tn The adjective יוֹתֵר (yoter) means “too much; excessive,” e.g., 7:16 “excessively righteous” (HALOT 404 s.v. יוֹתֵר 2; BDB 452 s.v. יוֹתֵר). It is derived from the root יֶתֶר (yeter, “what is left over”); see HALOT 452 s.v. I יֶתֶר. It is related to the verbal root יתר (Niphal “to be left over”; Hiphil “to have left over”); see HALOT 451–52 s.v. I יתר. The adjective is related to יִתְרוֹן (yitron, “advantage; profit”) which is a key-term in this section, creating a word-play: The wise man has a relative “advantage” (יִתְרוֹן) over the fool (2:13-14a); however, there is no ultimate advantage because both share the same fate, i.e., death (2:14b-15a). Thus, Qoheleth’s acquisition of tremendous wisdom (1:16; 2:9) was “excessive” because it exceeded its relative advantage over folly: it could not deliver him from the same fate as the fool. He had striven to obtain wisdom, yet it held no ultimate advantage.
15 tn Heb “And why was I wise (to) excess?” The rhetorical question is an example of negative affirmation, expecting a negative answer: “I gained nothing!” (E. W. Bullinger, Figures of Speech, 949).
16 tn Heb “So I said in my heart.”
17 tn Heb “and also this,” referring to the relative advantage of wisdom over folly.
18 tn The word “ultimately” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.
19 tn Heb “Whatever your hand finds to do.”
20 tn Heb “Sheol.”
21 tn Or “where you are about to go.”
22 tn The term “ax head” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity. The preceding noun “iron” functions as a metonymy of material (i.e., iron) for the object with which it is associated (i.e., ax head).
23 tn Heb “he”; the referent (the workman) is implied, and has been specified in the translation for clarity
24 tn The verb קלל in the Pilpel means “to sharpen; to make a blade sharp” (HALOT 1104 s.v. קלל 1).This denominative verb is derived from the rare noun II קָלַל “smooth; shiny” (referring to bronze; Ezek 1:7; Dan 10:6; HALOT 1105 s.v.). Sharpening the blade or head of a bronze ax will make it smooth and shiny. It is not derived from I קָלַל (qalal) “to treat light” or the noun I קְלָלָה (qÿlalah) “curse.” Nor is it related to I קָלַל “to shake” (Ezek 21:26); cf. HALOT 1104. BDB 886 s.v. קָלַל 2 erroneously relates it to I קָלַל, suggesting “to whet” or “to move quickly to and fro.”
25 tn Heb “face.”
26 tn Heb “strength.” The term וַחֲיָלִים (vakhayalim, conjunction + plural noun from חַיִל, khayil, “strength; efficiency”) is an example of a plural of intensification (GKC 397-98 §124.e). The point is that it is a waste of a great deal of strength and energy. If a person is not smart, he will have to use a lot of energy and waste his efficiency.