Kenath

In Bible versions:

Kenath: NET AVS NIV NRSV NASB TEV

a town in eastern Manasseh

Google Maps: Kenath (32° 45´, 36° 36´)

Hebrew

Strongs #07079: tnq Q@nath

Kenath = "possession"

1) a city in Gilead east of the Jordan taken possession of by a
certain Nobah and renamed in his own honour

7079 Qnath ken-awth'

from 7069; possession; Kenath, a place East of the
Jordan:-Kenath.
see HEBREW for 07069

Kenath [EBD]

possession, a city of Gilead. It was captured by Nobah, who called it by his own name (Num. 32:42). It has been identified with Kunawat, on the slopes of Jebel Hauran (Mount Bashan), 60 miles east from the south end of the Sea of Galilee.

Kenath [NAVE]

KENATH, called also Nobah. A city of Gilead, Num. 32:42; 1 Chr. 2:23.

KENATH [SMITH]

(possession), one of the cities on the east of Jordan, with its "daughter-towns" (Authorized Version "villages") taken possession of by a certain Nobah, who then called it by his own name, (Numbers 32:42)

KENATH [ISBE]

KENATH - ke'-nath (qenath; Kaath kaanath, in Septuagint, Codex Alexandrinus): A city in Bashan, taken along with its "daughters," i.e. "villages" from the Amorites by Nobah who gave it his own name (Nu 32:42). It was recaptured by Geshur and Aram (1 Ch 2:23). It is probably identical with the modern Kanawat, which is built on the site, and largely from the materials of an ancient city. It lies about 16 miles to the North of Bosra eski Sham, the Bostra of the Romans, on both sides of Wady Kanawat, where, descending from the slopes of Jebel ed-Druze, it plunges over a precipice, forming a picturesque waterfall. On the plateau above the modern village, there is a striking collection of Roman and Christian remains, the shapely forms of many columns lending distinction to the scene. One large building is associated with the name of the patriarch Job--Maqam Ayyub. The position commands a spacious and interesting view over the whole of the Chauran. The identification has been rejected by Socin (Baedeker, Pal3, 207), but his reasons are not given. Moore (Judges, 222) also rejects it, but for reasons that are not convincing.

W. Ewing