Numbers 1:47

The Exemption of the Levites

1:47 But ¹  the Levites, according to the tribe of their fathers, ²  were not numbered ³  among them.

Numbers 3:17-19

The Summary of Families

3:17 These were the sons ⁴  of Levi by their names: Gershon, Kohath, and Merari.

3:18 These are the names of the sons of Gershon by their families: Libni and Shimei. 3:19 The sons of Kohath by their families were: Amram, Izhar, Hebron, and Uzziel.

Numbers 4:36

4:36 and those of them numbered by their families were 2,750.

Numbers 4:44

4:44 those of them numbered by their families were 3,200.

Numbers 7:7

7:7 He gave two carts and four oxen to the Gershonites, as their service required;

Numbers 10:28

10:28 These were the traveling arrangements ⁵  of the Israelites according to their companies when they traveled. ⁶ 

Numbers 13:4

13:4 Now these were their names: from the tribe of Reuben, Shammua son of Zaccur;

Numbers 26:56

26:56 Their inheritance must be apportioned ⁷  by lot among the larger and smaller groups.

Numbers 32:36

32:36 Beth Nimrah, and Beth Haran as fortified cities, and constructed pens for their flocks.

Numbers 32:41

32:41 Now Jair son of Manasseh went and captured their small towns and named them Havvoth Jair.

---

¹ tn The vav (ו) on this word indicates a disjunction with the previous sequence of reports. It may be taken as a contrastive clause, translated “but” or “however.”

² tn The construction is unexpected, for Levites would be from the tribe of Levi. The note seems more likely to express that all these people were organized by tribal lineage, and so too the Levites, according to the tribe of their fathers – individual families of Levites.

³ tc The form in the text is הָתְפָּקְדוּ (hotpaqÿdu); if this is correct, then it is an isolated instance of the reflexive of the Qal of פָּקַד (paqad). Some, however, explain the form as the Hitpael without the doubling of the middle letter and with a compensatory lengthening of the vowel before it (G. B. Gray, Numbers [ICC], 10).

⁴ tn The word “sons of” does at the outset refer to the sons of Levi. But as the listing continues the expression refers more to the family groups of the various descendants.

⁵ tn Or “journeyings of.”

⁶ tn The verb is the preterite with vav (ו) consecutive. But in this sentence it should be subordinated as a temporal clause to the preceding statement, even though it follows it.

⁷ tn Heb “divided.”