5:17 They will eat up your crops and your food.
They will kill off 1 your sons and your daughters.
They will eat up your sheep and your cattle.
They will destroy your vines and your fig trees. 2
Their weapons will batter down 3
the fortified cities you trust in.
6:6 All of this is because 4 the Lord who rules over all 5 has said:
‘Cut down the trees around Jerusalem
and build up a siege ramp against its walls. 6
This is the city which is to be punished. 7
Nothing but oppression happens in it. 8
1 tn Heb “eat up.”
2 tn Or “eat up your grapes and figs”; Heb “eat up your vines and your fig trees.”
sn It was typical for an army in time of war in the ancient Near East not only to eat up the crops but to destroy the means of further production.
3 tn Heb “They will beat down with the sword.” The term “sword” is a figure of speech (synecdoche) for military weapons in general. Siege ramps, not swords, beat down city walls; swords kill people, not city walls.
4 tn Heb “For.” The translation attempts to make the connection clearer.
5 tn Heb “Yahweh of armies.”
sn For an explanation of the significance of this title see the study note on 2:19.
6 tn Heb “Cut down its trees and build up a siege ramp against Jerusalem.” The referent has been moved forward from the second line for clarity.
7 tn Or “must be punished.” The meaning of this line is uncertain. The LXX reads, “Woe, city of falsehood!” The MT presents two anomalies: a masculine singular verb with a feminine singular subject in a verbal stem (Hophal) that elsewhere does not have the meaning “is to be punished.” Hence many follow the Greek which presupposes הוֹי עִיר הַשֶּׁקֶר (hoy ’ir hasheqer) instead of הִיא הָעִיר הָפְקַד (hi’ ha’ir hofqad). The Greek is the easier reading in light of the parallelism, and it would be hard to explain how the MT arose from it. KBL suggests reading a noun meaning “licentiousness” which occurs elsewhere only in Mishnaic Hebrew, hence “this is the city, the licentious one” (attributive apposition; cf. KBL 775 s.v. פֶּקֶר). Perhaps the Hophal perfect (הָפְקַד, hofÿqad) should be revocalized as a Niphal infinitive absolute (הִפָּקֹד, hippaqod); this would solve both anomalies in the MT since the Niphal is used in this nuance and the infinitive absolute can function in place of a finite verb (cf. GKC 346 §113.ee and ff). This, however, is mere speculation and is supported by no Hebrew
8 tn Heb “All of it oppression in its midst.”