2:23 O God of my fathers, I acknowledge and glorify you,
for you have bestowed wisdom and power on me.
Now you have enabled me to understand what I 1 requested from you.
For you have enabled me to understand the king’s dilemma.” 2
6:10 When Daniel realized 10 that a written decree had been issued, he entered his home, where the windows 11 in his upper room opened toward Jerusalem. 12 Three 13 times daily he was 14 kneeling 15 and offering prayers and thanks to his God just as he had been accustomed to do previously.
11:36 “Then the king 24 will do as he pleases. He will exalt and magnify himself above every deity and he will utter presumptuous things against the God of gods. He will succeed until the time of 25 wrath is completed, for what has been decreed must occur. 26
1 tn Aram “we.” Various explanations have been offered for the plural, but it is probably best understood as the editorial plural; so also with “me” later in this verse.
2 tn Aram “the word of the king.”
3 tn Aram “a revealer of mysteries.” The phrase serves as a quasi-title for God in Daniel.
4 tn Aram “in the latter days.”
5 tn Aram “your dream and the visions of your head upon your bed.”
6 tn Aram “after this.”
7 tn Aram “heart.”
8 tn Aram “his dwelling.”
9 tn Aram “prays a prayer.”
10 tn Aram “knew.”
11 sn In later rabbinic thought this verse was sometimes cited as a proof text for the notion that one should pray only in a house with windows. See b. Berakhot 34b.
12 map For the location of Jerusalem see Map5-B1; Map6-F3; Map7-E2; Map8-F2; Map10-B3; JP1-F4; JP2-F4; JP3-F4; JP4-F4.
13 sn This is apparently the only specific mention in the OT of prayer being regularly offered three times a day. The practice was probably not unique to Daniel, however.
14 tc Read with several medieval Hebrew
15 tn Aram “kneeling on his knees” (so NASB).
sn No specific posture for offering prayers is prescribed in the OT. Kneeling, as here, and standing were both practiced.
16 tn Heb “we have not pacified the face of.”
17 tn Or “by gaining insight.”
18 tn Heb “by your truth.” The Hebrew term does not refer here to abstract truth, however, but to the reliable moral guidance found in the covenant law. See vv 10-11.
19 tn Heb “turn your ear.”
20 tn Heb “desolations.” The term refers here to the ruined condition of Judah’s towns.
21 tn Heb “over which your name is called.” Cf. v. 19. This expression implies that God is the owner of his city, Jerusalem. Note the use of the idiom in 2 Sam 12:28; Isa 4:1; Amos 9:12.
22 tn Heb “praying our supplications before you.”
23 tn Heb “gave your heart.”
24 sn The identity of this king is problematic. If vv. 36-45 continue the description of Antiochus Epiphanes, the account must be viewed as erroneous, since the details do not match what is known of Antiochus’ latter days. Most modern scholars take this view, concluding that this section was written just shortly before the death of Antiochus and that the writer erred on several key points as he tried to predict what would follow the events of his own day. Conservative scholars, however, usually understand the reference to shift at this point to an eschatological figure, viz., the Antichrist. The chronological gap that this would presuppose to be in the narrative is not necessarily a problem, since by all accounts there are many chronological gaps throughout the chapter, as the historical figures intended by such expressions as “king of the north” and “king of the south” repeatedly shift.
25 tn The words “the time of” are added in the translation for clarification.
26 tn Heb “has been done.” The Hebrew verb used here is the perfect of certitude, emphasizing the certainty of fulfillment.