Since it was the ninth month of the year, the king was sitting in his winter quarters. 1 A fire was burning in the firepot in front of him. 2
It was the ninth month and the king was sitting in the winter apartment, with a fire burning in the brazier in front of him.
Now the king was sitting in the winter house in the ninth month, with a fire burning in the brazier before him.
It was late autumn, and the king was in a winterized part of the palace, sitting in front of a fire to keep warm.
It was December. The king was sitting in his winter quarters in front of a charcoal fire.
Now the king was seated in the winter house, and a fire was burning in the fireplace in front of him.
Now the king was sitting in his winter apartment (it was the ninth month), and there was a fire burning in the brazier before him.
Now the king was sitting in the winter house in the ninth month, with a fire burning on the hearth before him.
Now the king
in the winterhouse
in the ninth
and [there was a fire] on the hearth
|NET © [draft] ITL|
Since it was the ninth
year, the king
in his winter
. A fire was burning
in the firepot
in frontof him.
|NET © Notes||
1 tn Heb “in the autumn house.” Commentators are agreed that this was not a separate building or palace but the winter quarters in the palace.
sn Larger houses, including the palace, were two-storied buildings with a lower quarters better suited for the cold of winter and an upper quarters which was better ventilated to provide cool in the summer. Since this was the ninth month (December) the king had taken up residence in the lower, warmer quarters which were equipped with a portable fire pot or brazier to keep him warm.
2 tc Heb “the fire in the firepot was burning before him.” The translation assumes that the word “fire” (אֵשׁ, ’esh) has dropped out after the particle אֶת (’et) because of the similar beginnings of the two words. The word “fire” is found in the Greek, Syriac, and Targumic translations according to BHS. The particle אֵת should be retained rather than dropped as an erroneous writing of אֵשׁ. Its presence is to be explained as the usage of the sign of the accusative introducing a new subject (cf. BDB 85 s.v. אֶת 3.α and compare the usage in 27:8; 38:16 [in the Kethib]; 45:4).