31:40 then let thorns sprout up in place of wheat,
and in place of barley, weeds!” 1
The words of Job are ended.
V. The Speeches of Elihu (32:1-37:24)Elihu’s First Speech 2
32:1 So these three men refused to answer 3 Job further, because he was righteous in his 4 own eyes. 32:2 Then Elihu son of Barakel the Buzite, of the family of Ram, became very angry. 5 He was angry 6 with Job for justifying 7 himself rather than God. 8 32:3 With Job’s 9 three friends he was also angry, because they could not find 10 an answer, and so declared Job guilty. 11 32:4 Now Elihu had waited before speaking 12 to Job, because the others 13 were older than he was.
1 tn The word בָּאְשָׁה (bo’shah, from בָּאַשׁ [ba’as, “to have a foul smell”]) must refer to foul smelling weeds.
2 sn There are now four speeches from another friend of Job, Elihu. But Job does not reply to any of these, nor does the
3 tn The form is the infinitive construct (“answer”) functioning as the object of the preposition; the phrase forms the complement of the verb “they ceased to answer” (= “they refused to answer further”).
4 tc The LXX, Syriac, and Symmachus have “in their eyes.” This is adopted by some commentators, but it does not fit the argument.
5 tn The verse begins with וַיִּחַר אַף (vayyikhar ’af, “and the anger became hot”), meaning Elihu became very angry.
6 tn The second comment about Elihu’s anger comes right before the statement of its cause. Now the perfect verb is used: “he was angry.”
7 tn The explanation is the causal clause עַל־צַדְּקוֹ נַפְשׁוֹ (’al-tsaddÿqo nafsho, “because he justified himself”). It is the preposition with the Piel infinitive construct with a suffixed subjective genitive.
8 tc The LXX and Latin versions soften the expression slightly by saying “before God.”
9 tn Heb “his”; the referent (Job) has been specified in the translation to indicate whose friends they were.
10 tn The perfect verb should be given the category of potential perfect here.
11 tc This is one of the eighteen “corrections of the scribes” (tiqqune sopherim); it originally read, “and they declared God [in the wrong].” The thought was that in abandoning the debate they had conceded Job’s point.
12 tc This reading requires repointing the word בִּדְבָרִים (bidbarim, “with words”) to בְּדָבְּרָם (bÿdabbÿram, “while they spoke [with Job]”). If the MT is retained, it would mean “he waited for Job with words,” which while understandable is awkward.
13 tn Heb “they”; the referent (the other friends) has been specified in the translation for clarity.