35:1 Then Elihu answered:
and, ‘What do I gain by not sinning?’ 6
and to your friends with you.
35:5 Gaze at the heavens and see;
consider the clouds, which are higher than you! 9
If your transgressions are many,
what does it do to him? 11
35:7 If you are righteous, what do you give to God,
or what does he receive from your hand?
and your righteousness only other people. 13
because of the excess of oppression; 15
they cry out for help
35:10 But no one says, ‘Where is God, my Creator,
who gives songs in the night, 18
and makes us wiser than the birds of the sky?’
because of the arrogance of the wicked.
the Almighty does not take notice of it.
35:14 How much less, then,
when you say that you do not perceive him,
that the case is before him
and you are waiting for him! 23
that his anger does not punish, 25
and that he does not know transgression! 26
without knowledge he multiplies words.”
1 sn This short speech falls into two sections: Elihu refutes Job’s claim that goodness avails nothing (35:2-8), asserting that when the cry of the afflicted goes unanswered they have not learned their lesson (35:9-16).
2 tn The line could be read as “do you reckon this for justice? Here “to be” is understood.
3 tn The word “when” is not in the Hebrew text, but is implied.
4 tn The brief line could be interpreted in a number of ways. The MT simply has “my right from God.” It could be “I am right before God,” “I am more just/right than God” (identifying the preposition as a comparative min (מִן); cf. J. E. Hartley, Job [NICOT], 463), “I will be right before God,” or “My just cause against God.”
5 tn The referent of “you” is usually understood to be God.
6 tn The Hebrew text merely says, “What do I gain from my sin?” But Job has claimed that he has not sinned, and so this has to be elliptical: “more than if I had sinned” (H. H. Rowley, Job [NCBC], 224). It could also be, “What do I gain without sin?”
7 tn The emphatic pronoun calls attention to Elihu who will answer these questions.
8 tn The Hebrew text adds, “with words,” but since this is obvious, for stylistic reasons it has not been included in the translation.
9 tn The preposition is taken here as a comparative min (מִן). The line could also read “that are high above you.” This idea has appeared in the speech of Eliphaz (22:12), Zophar (11:7ff.), and even Job (9:8ff.).
12 tn The phrase “affects only” is supplied in the translation of this nominal sentence.
sn According to Strahan, “Elihu exalts God’s greatness at the cost of His grace, His transcendence at the expense of His immanence. He sets up a material instead of a spiritual stand of profit and loss. He does not realize that God does gain what He desires most by the goodness of men, and loses what He most loves by their evil.”
13 tn Heb “and to [or for] a son of man, your righteousness.”
14 tn The word “people” is supplied, because the sentence only has the masculine plural verb.
15 tn The final noun is an abstract plural, “oppression.” There is no reason to change it to “oppressors” to fit the early versions. The expression is literally “multitude of oppression.”
16 tn Heb “the arm,” a metaphor for strength or power.
17 tn Or “of the many” (see HALOT 1172 s.v. I רַב 6.a).
18 tn There have been several attempts to emend the line, none of which are particularly helpful or interesting. H. H. Rowley (Job [NCBC], 225) says, “It is a pity to rob Elihu of a poetic line when he creates one.”
19 tn The form in the text, the Piel participle from אָלַף (’alaf, “teach”) is written in a contracted form; the full form is מְאַלְּפֵנוּ (mÿ’allÿfenu).
20 tn Some would render this “teaches us by the beasts.” But Elihu is stressing the unique privilege humans have.
22 tn Heb “surely – vanity, he does not hear.” The cry is an empty cry, not a prayer to God. Dhorme translates it, “It is a pure waste of words.”
23 sn The point is that if God does not listen to those who do not turn to him, how much less likely is he to turn to one who complains against him.
25 tn The verb פָקַד (paqad) means “to visit” (also “to appoint; to muster; to number”). When God visits, it means that he intervenes in one’s life for blessing or cursing (punishing, destroying).
26 tn The word פַּשׁ (pash) is a hapax legomenon. K&D 12:275 derived it from an Arabic word meaning “belch,” leading to the idea of “overflow.” BDB 832 s.v. defines it as “folly.” Several define it as “transgression” on the basis of the versions (Theodotion, Symmachus, Vulgate). The RSV took it as “greatly heed,” but that is not exactly “greatly know,” when the text beyond that requires “not know at all.” The NIV has “he does not take the least notice of wickedness.”
27 tn The word הֶבֶל (hevel) means “vanity; futility; to no purpose.”